REUSABLE
Enterprise security questionnaire reviewer · SIG/CAIQ assessor
Owner: Miz Causevic (solo founder)
Family: Open JSON specs + canonical hashing + ed25519 signing for the AI procurement era
Question: Can we point a buyer at one spec suite plus signing-key URL plus audit-stream and answer the procurement question without bespoke prep?
Gap: Public adoption telemetry (who-uses-it) is thinner than the spec depth itself — Pulse fills part of this; vendor adoption badges are still missing.
Next move: Ship vendor-adoption badges + spec-use scorecard sourced from procurement-pulse-engine universe.csv
SECURITY_REVIEW
REUSABLE
Enterprise security questionnaire reviewer · SIG/CAIQ assessor
Owner: Miz Causevic (solo founder)
Family: Quarterly ed25519-signed crawl of 1,457 domains across 38 verticals scoring AI-procurement disclosure depth
Question: Can we hand a buyer a public, signed measurement of the industry instead of self-report claims?
Gap: Per-vertical sub-issues would compound buyer signal — currently a single combined report per quarter.
Next move: Draft an interim between-issues spotlight for one vertical (HealthTech or FinTech) using the existing summarizer.
SECURITY_REVIEW
REUSABLE
Enterprise security questionnaire reviewer · SIG/CAIQ assessor
Owner: Miz Causevic (solo founder)
Family: Four operator surfaces distinct from /trust/ governance and /calculators/ rubric math
Question: Can a CFO or CRO open one of these surfaces and answer their operator question without a custom build?
Gap: Net-new lane after archiving 10 exec-family duplicates — buyer signal not yet collected for which of the 4 has highest pull-through.
Next move: Add lightweight per-surface usage analytics + a single contact path; let buyer choice show.
SECURITY_REVIEW
REUSABLE
Enterprise security questionnaire reviewer · SIG/CAIQ assessor
Owner: Miz Causevic (solo founder)
Family: Eight clinical / GxP-territory operator surfaces with explicit 'no compliance claim' discipline
Question: Can a regulated-industry reviewer see vertical depth plus readiness language posture without us tripping over compliance vocabulary?
Gap: No HealthTech buyer in the pipeline yet — surfaces are show-don't-tell evidence rather than active sales tools.
Next move: Draft a per-vertical HealthTech Pulse Issue to surface measurement of the broader sector beyond just our 8 surfaces.
SECURITY_REVIEW
NEEDS_WORK
Enterprise security questionnaire reviewer · SIG/CAIQ assessor
Owner: Miz Causevic (solo founder)
Family: Marketing, consent, and attribution governance — 4 named tracks at growth.kineticgain.com
Question: Can we show a martech / growth-ops buyer a coherent consent + experimentation + tokenization + attribution lane without a 6-month integration project?
Gap: identity-risk-evidence-ledger CI broken (eslint peer-dep, issue #11 filed) — blocks v1.0-prod hardening of one anchor repo.
Next move: When Codex pushes CI fix, harden identity-risk-evidence-ledger; meanwhile draft a Pulse Klaviyo-vertical spotlight.
SECURITY_REVIEW
REUSABLE
Enterprise security questionnaire reviewer · SIG/CAIQ assessor
Owner: Miz Causevic (solo founder)
Family: Eight browser-only AI diligence tools at the apex /trust/ pillar — no backend, no login, no telemetry
Question: Can a buyer risk team use a free public toolkit to draft AI System Cards, evidence packs, vendor intake, tabletop exercises, and risk registers without signing up for anything?
Gap: Per-tool usage analytics not present — choosing which to deepen next is currently guesswork.
Next move: Add minimal client-side counter (no server) + GSC submission for /trust/ subpages to surface usage signal.
SECURITY_REVIEW
NEEDS_WORK
Enterprise security questionnaire reviewer · SIG/CAIQ assessor
Owner: Miz Causevic (solo founder)
Family: Four seller-side operator surfaces — proof-gap monitor, trust-center evidence room, security-questionnaire answer studio, RFP response assembler
Question: Can we run our own diligence response through our own four surfaces and surface the proof gaps that close before a buyer asks?
Gap: Subdomain SSL first-time-provisioning lag (auto-resolves in 24h); per-surface analytics not yet wired.
Next move: Wait for SSL provisioning; then exercise full diligence-response cycle on a sample RFP to harden the end-to-end flow.
INTAKE
NEEDS_WORK
Enterprise security questionnaire reviewer · SIG/CAIQ assessor
Owner: Miz Causevic (solo founder)
Family: Drop-in audit-stream + Decision Card vault contract SDK for B2B SaaS embedders
Question: Can a SaaS embedder ship hash-chained + vault-contracted + ed25519-signable customer-data audit in three lines of code?
Gap: Not on npm registry yet — README updated to disclose publish-pending state and provide github: install fallback; commercial launch blocked on EIN, bank, Stripe, invoice infrastructure.
Next move: Land NPM_TOKEN secret + first npm publish (Miz escalation); meanwhile harden Procurement Packet Starter into a buyer-ready PDF.
SECURITY_REVIEW